Under Construction

Hemiselmis Parke

John M. Archibald taxon links [down<--]Cryptomonads Interpreting the tree
close box

This tree diagram shows the relationships between several groups of organisms.

The root of the current tree connects the organisms featured in this tree to their containing group and the rest of the Tree of Life. The basal branching point in the tree represents the ancestor of the other groups in the tree. This ancestor diversified over time into several descendent subgroups, which are represented as internal nodes and terminal taxa to the right.

example of a tree diagram

You can click on the root to travel down the Tree of Life all the way to the root of all Life, and you can click on the names of descendent subgroups to travel up the Tree of Life all the way to individual species.

For more information on ToL tree formatting, please see Interpreting the Tree or Classification. To learn more about phylogenetic trees, please visit our Phylogenetic Biology pages.

close box
Containing group: Cryptomonads

Introduction

Described by Parke; type species Hemiselmis rufescens (Parke 1949).

Characteristics

Discussion of Phylogenetic Relationships

The type strain of Hemiselmis rufescens, established and examined by Parke, is still available from the Plymouth Algal Culture Collection (UK), and thus was genetically characterized in the revision of the genus Hemiselmis (Lane and Archibald 2008). Hemiselmis appears to represent a consistent genus in molecular phylogenies without any evidence for dimorphism thus far (Figure 1; Lane and Archibald 2008). At least four different biliprotein types, three blue phycocyanins and one red phycoerythrin, can be found (Lane and Archibald 2008; Hoef-Emden 2008). The reddish Hemiselmis rufescens and Hemiselmis andersenii evolved from blue-green Hemiselmis species (Lane and Archibald 2008). The problems inherent in the morphospecies concept also apply to Hemiselmis: molecular phylogenetic trees show a higher genetic variation than the morphological characters do.

Click on an image to view larger version & data in a new window
Click on an image to view larger version & data in a new window

Figure 1. Molecular phylogeny of the genera Chroomonas, Hemiselmis and Komma. Maximum likelihood tree inferred from nucleomorph SSU rDNA sequences. PC, phycocyanin; PE, phycoerythrin; scale bar = substitutions per site. © 2008 Kerstin Hoef-Emden

Nucleomorph Genome

Preliminary analyses of the nucleomorph genomes of several members of the genus Hemiselmis have been performed (Lane and Archibald 2006, 2008). As in the model cryptophyte Guillardia theta (Douglas et al. 2001), all examined Hemiselmis species possess three nucleomorph chromosomes. Estimated genome sizes for the group range from ~560 kb in H. tepida to ~600 kb in H. rufescens. Unlike G. theta, which possesses complete and near identical ribosomal DNA operons on both ends of each nucleomorph chromosome (Douglas et al. 2001; Archibald 2007), Hemiselmis species are characterized by the absence of 18S and 28S loci on chromosome II (only the 5S locus is present on all 6 chromosome ends in examined species). Nucleomorph karyotype similarities within and between Hemiselmis species correlate with the molecular phylogenetic analyses performed thus far (Lane and Archibald 2008).

The nucleomorph genome of Hemiselmis andersenii CCMP644 has been completely sequenced (Lane et al. 2007). It is 571,872 bp in size and possesses 525 genes (472 protein genes and 53 non-mRNA genes). It encodes the identical set of 30 plastid-targeted proteins as Guillardia theta and also possesses a high gene density (1.09 kb/gene). The most striking feature of the H. andersenii genome is the complete absence of spliceosomal introns and genes for splicing RNAs and proteins (Lane et al. 2007). The G. theta nucleomorph genome possesses 17 small introns (42-52 bp) and genes for spliceosomal components (Douglas et al. 2001).

References

Archibald JM (2007) Nucleomorph genomes: structure, function, origin and evolution. BioEssays 29: 392-402

Clay B, Kugrens P (1999). Characterization of Hemiselmis amylosa sp. nov. and phylogenetic placement of the blue-green cryptomonads H. amylosa and Falcomonas daucoides. Protist 150: 297-310

Douglas SE, Zauner S, Fraunholz M, Beaton M, Penny S, Deng LT, Wu X, Reith M, Cavalier-Smith T, Maier UG (2001) The highly reduced genome of an enslaved algal nucleus. Nature 410: 1090-1096

Hoef-Emden K (2008) Molecular phylogeny of phycocyanin-containing cryptophytes: Evolution of biliproteins and geographical distribution. J. Phycol. 44: 985-993

Lane CE, Archibald JM (2006) Novel nucleomorph genome architecture in the cryptomonad genus Hemiselmis. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 44: 339-350

Lane CE, Archibald JM (2008) New marine members of the genus Hemiselmis (Cryptomonadales, Cryptophyceae). J. Phycol. 44: 339-350

Lane CE, van den Heuvel K, Kozera C, Curtis BA, Parsons B, Bowman S, Archibald JM (2007) Nucleomorph genome of Hemiselmis andersenii reveals complete intron loss and compaction as a driver of protein structure and function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 19908-19913

Parke M (1949) Studies on marine flagellates. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK 28: 255-285

Santore UJ (1984) Some aspects of taxonomy in the Cryptophyceae. New Phytol. 98: 627-646

About This Page

This page is being developed as part of the Tree of Life Web Project Protist Diversity Workshop, co-sponsored by the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR) program in Integrated Microbial Biodiversity and the Tula Foundation.

John M. Archibald
Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Correspondence regarding this page should be directed to John M. Archibald at

All Rights Reserved.

Citing this page:

Archibald, John M. 2008. Hemiselmis Parke. Version 14 September 2008 (under construction). http://tolweb.org/Hemiselmis/97239/2008.09.14 in The Tree of Life Web Project, http://tolweb.org/

edit this page
close box

This page is a Tree of Life Branch Page.

Each ToL branch page provides a synopsis of the characteristics of a group of organisms representing a branch of the Tree of Life. The major distinction between a branch and a leaf of the Tree of Life is that each branch can be further subdivided into descendent branches, that is, subgroups representing distinct genetic lineages.

For a more detailed explanation of the different ToL page types, have a look at the Structure of the Tree of Life page.

close box

Hemiselmis

Page Content

articles & notes

collections

people

Explore Other Groups

random page

  go to the Tree of Life home page
top