Furnarii
This tree diagram shows the relationships between several groups of organisms.
The root of the current tree connects the organisms featured in this tree to their containing group and the rest of the Tree of Life. The basal branching point in the tree represents the ancestor of the other groups in the tree. This ancestor diversified over time into several descendent subgroups, which are represented as internal nodes and terminal taxa to the right.
You can click on the root to travel down the Tree of Life all the way to the root of all Life, and you can click on the names of descendent subgroups to travel up the Tree of Life all the way to individual species.
For more information on ToL tree formatting, please see Interpreting the Tree or Classification. To learn more about phylogenetic trees, please visit our Phylogenetic Biology pages.
close boxDiscussion of Phylogenetic Relationships
There is a basal polytomy in Furnarii among three clades: Melanopareia (crescent-chests), a genus traditionally assigned to Rhinocryptidae (Irestedt et al. 2002; Chesser 2004), Thamnophilidae (typical antbirds) plus Conopophagidae (gnateaters), and remaining Furnarii (Irestedt et al. 2001, 2002; Chesser 2004; but see Barker et al. 2002, 2004 for a different placement of conopophagids). Thamnophilidae is a clade detached from Formicariidae (then just "antbirds") by Sibley and Ahlquist (1990). But even with thamnophilids removed, Formicariidae (ground antbirds) has proven to be paraphyletic. It is divided into two parts; one of them, ant-pittas, is the sister group of Rhinocryptidae (tapaculos) while the other, ant-thrushes, is sister to Furnariidae (ovenbirds) and Dendrocolaptidae (woodcreepers). (There is so far no formal name for either of these divisions of Formicariidae.) Furnariidae is paraphyletic to Dendrocolaptidae (Irestedt et al. 2002; Chesser 2004).
References
Barker, F. K., G. F. Barrowclough, and J. G. Groth. 2002. A phylogenetic hypothesis for passerine birds; Taxonomic and biogeographic implications of an analysis of nuclear DNA sequence data. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:295-308.
Barker, F. K., A. Cibois, P. Schikler, J. Feinstein, and J. Cracraft. 2004. Phylogeny and diversification of the largest avian radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:11040-11045.
Chesser, R. T. 2004. Molecular systematics of New World suboscine birds. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 32:11-24.
Irestedt, M., U. S. Johansson, T. J. Parsons, and P. G. P. Ericson. 2001. Phylogeny of major lineages of suboscines (Passeriformes) analysed by nuclear DNA sequence data. J. Avian Biol. 32:15-25.
Irestedt, M., J. Fjelds?, U. S. Johansson, and P. G. P. Ericson. 2002. Systematic relationships and biogeography of the tracheophone suboscines (Aves: Passeriformes). Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 23:499-512.
Sibley, C. G., and J. A. Ahlquist. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of birds, Yale U. Press, New Haven.
About This Page
Page copyright © 2006
- First online 02 August 2006
- Content changed 02 August 2006
Citing this page:
Tree of Life Web Project. 2006. Furnarii. Version 02 August 2006 (under construction). http://tolweb.org/Furnarii/67980/2006.08.02 in The Tree of Life Web Project, http://tolweb.org