go to the Tree of Life home page
This is an archived version of a Tree of Life page. For up-to-date information, please refer to the current version of this page.


Mammals and their extinct relatives

Michel Laurin and Robert R. Reisz
taxon links [down<--]Amniota extinct icon extinct icon extinct icon extinct icon extinct icon extinct icon extinct icon extinct icon extinct icon extinct icon [up-->]Therapsida Interpreting the tree
close box

This tree diagram shows the relationships between several groups of organisms.

The root of the current tree connects the organisms featured in this tree to their containing group and the rest of the Tree of Life. The basal branching point in the tree represents the ancestor of the other groups in the tree. This ancestor diversified over time into several descendent subgroups, which are represented as internal nodes and terminal taxa to the right.

example of a tree diagram

You can click on the root to travel down the Tree of Life all the way to the root of all Life, and you can click on the names of descendent subgroups to travel up the Tree of Life all the way to individual species.

For more information on ToL tree formatting, please see Interpreting the Tree or Classification. To learn more about phylogenetic trees, please visit our Phylogenetic Biology pages.

close box

Phylogeny of synapsids, after Reisz (1986) and Laurin (1993). Terminology after Kemp (1982), Reisz (1986), and Reisz et al. (1992).

Containing group: Amniota


Synapsids include mammals and all extinct amniotes more closely related to mammals than to reptiles. Synapsids are the dominant large terrestrial animals worldwide, and they have also invaded the oceans (whales, pinnipeds) and the air (bats). The oldest known synapsid is an ophiacodontid from the Middle Pennsylvanian (320 million years ago) of Joggins, Nova Scotia. By the Lower Permian, therapsids (the group that includes mammals and most of their Upper Permian and more recent relatives) had appeared (Laurin and Reisz, 1990, 1996). However, the oldest known mammal only dates back to the Jurassic (Rowe, 1988). The fossil record of synapsids is one of the most extensive of any groups of vertebrates. This fossil record has been used to illustrate the concept of evolution (Hopson, 1987) and to test macroevolutionary patterns (Kemp, 1985). The largest gap in this fossil record is between the Permo-Carboniferous synapsids and therapsids.

The fossil record provides conclusive evidence that synapsids are the first amniotes to diversify. Synapsids quickly became the most diverse, widespread and most common amniotes in the Late Carboniferous, and they maintained this predominant position throughout the Paleozoic. Only during the Early Mesozoic are the synapsids eclipsed by the evolutionary radiation of reptiles (Benton, 1983; Charig, 1984). Within the Late Carboniferous and Early Permian, two different herbivorous and several faunivorous synapsid groups can be recognized.

The fossil record suggests that during the Carboniferous and Early Permian, synapsids and other amniotes were restricted to the paleoequatorial and subequatorial regions. During the Late Permian, the distribution of synapsids, and of some of the other amniotes becomes cosmopolitan. However, the evidence for this pattern rests on rather weak negative evidence (i. e., no Permo-Carboniferous synapsids have been found outside paleoequatorial regions, but other areas have not been prospected intensively).

Early synapsids had a sprawling posture and a small brain, like most early tetrapods. The parasagittal gait characteristic of most mammals (Fig. 1) appeared gradually because some therapsids were apparently capable of sprawling and parasagittal gait, and this character may have appeared in the hind limb before the fore limb. Early synapsids were moderately large (body length between 50 cm and 3 m) and most were carnivorous or insectivorous, but caseids and Edaphosaurus were herbivorous. Mammals include the largest tetrapods that ever lived (the blue whale is larger than any dinosaur), as well as very small species.

Most mammals are viviparous, but the platypus (a monotreme) is oviparous, and most, if not all, non-mammalian synapsids were probably oviparous. All mammals have mammary glands, but the presence of these structures cannot be determined in extinct taxa. The oldest preserved synapsid hair appears to belong to a Paleocene multituberculate (Meng and Wyss, 1997). The position of this group has been debated, but they are probably mammals (Rowe, 1988), so the presence of hair in multituberculates was predictible.

 image info

Figure 1. An extant synapsid (a black-tailed deer). Like most of the
other 3500 extant synapsid species, it is endothermic and has fur, but these
features were certainly absent in all Paleozoic synapsids. Photograph by Roger Laurin.


All known early synapsids had a lateral temporal fenestra (a hole in the lateral surface of the skull behind the orbit) that is still present in a modified form in mammals. Primitively, the lateral temporal fenestra was bordered by only three bones (Fig. 2).

 image info

Figure 2. Temporal fenestration primitively found in synapsids.
Abbreviations: J, jugal; Po, postorbital; Sq, squamosal. Scale equals 1 cm.

The occiput was broad and it faced posterodorsally. In other early amniotes, the endochondral bones of the braincase formed a narrower surface, and it was more or less vertical.

The pubis had a long, ridged anterodorsal edge.


The earliest synapsids were probably ectothermic (their body temperature depended on the environment), as shown by the presence of a large "sail" on the back of edaphosaurids and some sphenacodontids. This sail was composed of greatly elongated neural spines that was grooved anteriorly and posteriorly to accommodate blood vessels, and skin probably connected all the neural spines together. This sail may have allowed these early synapsids to raise their body temperature faster than similarly-sized tetrapods lacking a sail. It was also thought that the sail was used to radiate excess heat into the environment, but recent studies suggest otherwise (Haack, 1986). The presence of the sail suggests that early synapsids lacked hair. Hair usually does not fossilize, but its presence in most monotremes, marsupials, and placentals suggests that it was present in their last common ancestor. Endothermy is also difficult to determine in extinct taxa, but it probably appeared slightly before the first mammal was born. The presence of epidermal horny scales cannot be determined in most fossil taxa, but bony ventral scales were primitively present, as shown by their presence in most reasonably complete fossils of early synapsids.

Discussion of Phylogenetic Relationships

Early synapsid phylogeny is relatively uncontroversial. Recent studies by Reisz (1980, 1986), Brinkman and Eberth (1983), Gauthier et al. (1988), and Laurin (1993) have resolved the relationships between the largest groups of early synapsids. More recent studies by Reisz et al. (1992) and Berman et al. (1995) have confirmed these findings.

Reisz (1980) produced the first phylogeny of synapsids using phylogenetic systematics. He argued that most carnivorous synapsids (ophiacodontids, varanopseids, sphenacodontines, and therapsids formed a clade that excluded the herbivorous edaphosaurids and caseids.

        ============ Eothyrididae
     |  ============ Caseidae
     |  ============ Edaphosauridae
     |  |
=====|  |  ========= Ophiacodontidae
     |  |  |
     ===|  |  ====== Varanopseidae
        ===|  |
           ===|  === Sphenacodontidae
                 === Therapsida

Brinkman and Eberth (1983) argued that varanopseids were closely related to caseids and that edaphosaurids were closely related to sphenacodontids:

        ========= Caseidae
     |  ========= Varanopseidae
     |  ========= Ophiacodontidae
=====|  |
     |  |  ====== Edaphosauridae
     ===|  |
        ===|  === Sphenacodontidae
              === Therapsida

Reisz (1986) agreed with Brinkman and Eberth (1983) that edaphosaurids were closely related to sphenacodontids, but he argued that varanopseids were more closely related to ophiacodontids than to caseids:

        ============ Eothyrididae
     |  ============ Caseidae
     |  ============ Varanopseidae
     |  |
=====|  |  ========= Ophiacodontidae
     |  |  |
     ===|  |  ====== Edaphosauridae
        ===|  |
           ===|  === Sphenacodontidae
                 === Therapsida

This new position of varanopseids has not been directly questioned by subsequent studies. The phylogeny of Gauthier et al. (1988) resembled that of Brinkman and Eberth (1983), but they did not test the monophyly of the varanopseid-caseid clade.

Gauthier et al. (1989), Hopson (1991), and Reisz et al. (1992) suggested that Haptodus, previously believed to be a sphencodontid, did not belong to this group:

     =============== Varanopseidae
     |  ============ Ophiacodontidae
     |  |
     |  |  ========= Edaphosauridae
=====|  |  |
     ===|  |  ====== Haptodus
        ===|  |
           ===|  === Sphenacodontidae
                 === Therapsida

Laurin (1993) studied the relationships of several problematic taxa previously called haptodontines. He suggested that haptodontines were a paraphyletic group:

     ======================== Varanopseidae
     |  ===================== Ophiacodontidae
     |  |
     |  |  ================== Edaphosauridae
     |  |  |                                         
     |  |  |  =============== Haptodus garnettensis  |
     |  |  |  |                                      |
=====|  |  |  |  ============ Palaeohatteria         |
     ===|  |  |  |                                   | "haptodontines"
        ===|  |  |  ========= Pantelosaurus          |
           ===|  |  |                                |
              ===|  |  ====== Cutleria               |
                 ===|  |
                    ===|  === Sphenacodontidae
                          === Therapsida

See the page on Evolution of early synapsids for synapomorphies justifying the latest phylogenies and for anatomical drawings.


Benton M. J. 1983. Dinosaur success in the Triassic: a noncompetitive ecological model. Quarterly Review of Biology 58: 29-55.

Berman D. S., R. R. Reisz, J. R. Bolt, and D. Scott. 1995. The cranial anatomy and relationships of the synapsid Varanosaurus (Eupelycosauria: Ophiacodontidae) from the Early Permian of Texas and Oklahoma. Annals of Carnegie Museum 64: 99-133.

Brinkman, D. and D. A. Eberth. 1983. The interrelationships of pelycosaurs. Breviora 473: 1-35.

Charig A. 1984. Competition between therapsids and archosaurs during the Triassic period: a review and synthesis of current theories. In: M. W. J. Ferguson (ed.) The structure, development and evolution of reptiles: 597-628. London: Academic Press.

Gauthier, J., A. G. Kluge, and T. Rowe. 1988. Amniote phylogeny and the importance of fossils. Cladistics 4: 105-209.

Gauthier J., D. C. Cannatella, K. De Queiroz, A. G. Kluge, and T. Rowe. 1989. Tetrapod phylogeny. In: B. Fernholm, K. Bremer, and H. Jornvall (ed.) The Hierarchy of Life: 337-353. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (Biomedical Division).

Haack, S. C. 1986. A thermal model of the sailback pelycosaur. Paleobiology 12: 450-458.

Hopson J. A. 1987. The Mammal-like Reptiles. A study of transitional fossils. The American biology teacher 49: 16-26.

Hopson J. A. 1991. Systematics of the nonmammalian Synapsida and implications for patterns of evolution in synapsids. In: H.-P. Schultze and L. Trueb (ed.) Origins of the higher groups of tetrapods—Controversy and Consensus: 635-693. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Kemp, T. S. 1982. Mammal-like Reptiles and the Origin of Mammals. Academic press, New York, 363 pp.

Kemp T. S. 1985. Synapsid reptiles and the origin of higher taxa. Special Papers in Palaeontology 33: 175-184.

Laurin, M. 1993. Anatomy and relationships of Haptodus garnettensis, a Pennsylvanian synapsid from Kansas. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 13: 200-229.

Laurin, M. and R. R. Reisz. 1990. Tetraceratops is the oldest known therapsid. Nature 345: 249-250.

Laurin M. and R. R. Reisz. 1996. The osteology and relationships of Tetraceratops insignis, the oldest known therapsid. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 16: 95-102.

Meng J. and A. R. Wyss. 1997. Multituberculate and other mammal hair recovered from Palaeogene excreta. Nature 385: 712-714.

Reisz R. R. 1980. The Pelycosauria: A review of phylogenetic relationships. In: A. L. Panchen (ed.) The Terrestrial Environment and the Origin of Land Vertebrates: 553-592. London: Academic Press.

Reisz, R. R. 1986. Pelycosauria. Encyclopedia of Paleoherpetology 17A: 1-102.

Reisz, R. R., D. S. Berman, and D. Scott. 1992. The cranial anatomy and relationships of Secodontosaurus, an unusual mammal-like reptile (Pelycosauria: Sphenacodontidae) from the early Permian of Texas. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 104: 127-184.

Rowe T. 1988. Definition, diagnosis, and origin of Mammalia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 8: 241-264.

Zimmer C. Meet the relatives. Discover, 1991, 56-57.

Information on the Internet

For a general introduction to mammals, see the page on Phylogeny of the Mammals (UCMP, Berkeley)
Title Illustrations
Scientific Name Tetraceratops
Location Texas
Comments Tetraceratops, the oldest known therapsid. This strange synapsid, found in Texas in the last century, has recently been reinterpreted as the only known Lower Permian therapsid (Laurin and Reisz, 1990).
Reference Zimmer C. 1991. Meet the relatives. Discover, 1991, 56-57
Creator Drawing by Steve Kirk
Specimen Condition Fossil -- Period: Lower Permian
Copyright © 1991 Discover Magazine
About This Page

Michel Laurin

"Evolution et adaptations des syst?mes ost?omusculaires"
Case 7077
Universit? Paris 7
Paris 75005

Department of Zoology
Erindale Campus
University of Toronto
3359 Mississauga Road N.
Mississauga, Ontario
Canada L5L 1C6

Correspondence regarding this page should be directed to Michel Laurin at

Citing this page:

Laurin, Michel and Reisz, Robert R. 1997. Synapsida. Mammals and their extinct relatives. Version 24 March 1997 (complete). http://tolweb.org/Synapsida/14845/1997.03.24 in The Tree of Life Web Project, http://tolweb.org/

close box

This page is a Tree of Life Branch Page.

Each ToL branch page provides a synopsis of the characteristics of a group of organisms representing a branch of the Tree of Life. The major distinction between a branch and a leaf of the Tree of Life is that each branch can be further subdivided into descendent branches, that is, subgroups representing distinct genetic lineages.

For a more detailed explanation of the different ToL page types, have a look at the Structure of the Tree of Life page.

close box


Page Content




Explore Other Groups

random page