Ommastrephinae Posselt 1891

Introduction

Members of the Ommastrephinae are the most oceanic members of the Ommastrephidae and are commonly attracted to surface night-lights in the open ocean. Some species are fished commercially and one species, Ommastrephes bartramii, was taken in the North Pacific in quantities over 350,000 tons per year during the 1980s (Bower and Ichii, 2005). This subfamily contains the largest species (Doscidicus gigas) reaching a size of 120 cm ML and the smallest species (Hyaloteuthis pelagica) reaching a size of about 9 cm ML (Nesis, 1982/87). A wide variety of luminous organs are present on the mantle, head, arms, viscera and eyes but vary with species.

Brief diagnosis:

Ommastrephids with ...

• photophores. 

Characteristics

1. Arms
   1. Hectocotylus usually with distal ventral protective membrane expanded to form a flange (not expanded in Ommastrephes where it tapers toward tip).
   2. Hectocotylus possesses pores in some genera.
   

   Click on an image to view larger version & data in a new window

   

   Figure. Mostly oral views of hectocotylized left or right ventral arms of representatives of Ommastrephinae genera. A - Ommastrephes bartramii. B - Sthenoteuthis pteropus, right arm. C - Dosidicus gigas, right arm. D - Eucleoteuthis luminosa, left arm. E - Hyaloteuthis pelagica, distal part of right arm, simplified. F - Ornithoteuthis volatilis, distal 2/3 right arm; left - oral view; right - ventrolateral view. v - Ventral side of arm. Drawings from Roeleveld (1988).  Arrows point to pores.
   
2. Tentacles
   1.  Suckers of dactylus of tentacular club in four series.
   2. Carpal locking-apparatus usually present with one to several smooth-ringed suckers and corresponding knobs (absent in Ornithoteuthis).
      
      

      Click on an image to view larger version & data in a new window

      
      

      Figure. Oral view of the tentacular club of O, bartramii, 303 m ML, off Baja California. Drawing from Young (1972).

3. Head
   1. Funnel groove usually with anterior foveola and side pockets (both absent in Ornithoteuthis).
      

      Click on an image to view larger version & data in a new window

      

      Figure. Left - Ventral view of the funnel groove comparing modifications in two of the subfamilies. Drawing modified from Roper, et al. (1985). Right - Oral-oblique view of the funnel (with funnel valve protruding) and funnel groove of Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis showing foveola and side pockets. Photograph by R. Young.
      

4. Photophores
   1. Photophores present in all species.
      
   2. Subcutaneous photophores present in all species except those of Ornithoteuthis.
      
   

   Click on an image to view larger version & data in a new window

   
   

   Figure. Ventral (top) and dorsal (bottom) views of the mantle of Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis that has been cleared and the photophores (and gladius, funnel locking-apparatus) stained with alcian blue stain. The numerous small, dark dots are subcutaneous photophores embedded in the mantle muscle. The lower, left arrow points to a dense patch of several hundred photophores. Photograph modified from Kishimoto and Kohno (1992).
   

   Table. Comparison of genera of Ommastrephinae

   	Largest manus sucker	Visceral photophores	Enlarged subcutaneous photophores	Hectocotyllus with lateral pores	Arm tips
   Ornithoteuthis	Toothed, no enlarged teeth	One or two round organs, streak	None	Yes	Normal
   Dosidicus	Toothed, enlarged tooth in each quadrant	Two round organs, no streaks	None	Yes	Attenuate at >35 cm ML, with 200-500 small suckers
   Ommastrephes	Toothed, enlarged tooth in each quadrant	None	None	No	Normal
   Sthenoteuthis	Toothed, enlarged tooth in each quadrant	Two round organs, no streaks	None	Yes; No in early maturing form	Normal
   Eucleoteuthis	Smooth except one tooth	One round organ, no streaks	Pads and streaks	No	Normal
   Hyaloteuthis	Smooth, sometimes one tooth	One round organ, no streaks	19 circular pads	No	Normal

   

   Click on an image to view larger version & data in a new window

   

   Figure. Explanation of table characters: Types of largest manus suckers. Drawings from Roeleveld (1988).

References

Kishimoto, H. and H. Kohno. 1992. Development of the luminous organ in the purpleback flying squid, Sthenoteuthis oualaniensis, as shown by Alcian Blue stain techniques. Bull. Inst. Oceanic Res. & Develop., Tokai Univ, 13: 71-83.

Nesis, K. N. 1982. Abridged key to the cephalopod mollusks of the world's ocean. 385,ii pp. Light and Food Industry Publishing House, Moscow. (In Russian.). Translated into English by B. S. Levitov, ed. by L. A. Burgess (1987), Cephalopods of the world. T. F. H. Publications, Neptune City, NJ, 351pp.

Roeleveld, M. A. 1988. Generic interrelationships within the Ommastrephidae (Cephalopoda). P.277-314. In: M. R. Clarke and E. R. Trueman (eds.). The Mollusca. Vol. 12. Paleontology and Neontology of Cephalopods. Academic Press, N.Y., 355pp.

Roper, C. F. E., M. J. Sweeney, And C. E. Nauen. 1985. FAO species catalogue. Vol. 3. Cephalopods of the World. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries. FAO Fish. Synop., (125)3:277 pp.